George R.R. Martin — the author who changed fantasy as a genre

If George R.R. Martin dies without completing the Game of Thrones series, there will be many people who look for him in the afterlife to have a word. He made a huge impression on me when I began the first volume of the series expecting one character to become the hero. Twenty pages later, he was dead. I’d never seen that before in fantasy. He has definitely had a huge impact on what’s included in the term “fantasy” and how creative one can be. These books are fantastic to read and also amazing to listen to — rather like the very differently textured Harry Potter books.

Two interesting articles from the NY Times about George R.R. Martin.

George R.R. Martin, photographed in Nambé Pueblo, N.M., on Aug. 12, 2018.CreditCreditAlessandra Sanguinetti/Magnum Photos

George R. R. Martin, Fantasy’s Reigning King

The author of “A Game of Thrones” has expanded the realms of genre fiction and prestige television — and forever changed how we engage with an imagined universe.

George R.R. Martin, photographed in Nambé Pueblo, N.M., on Aug. 12, 2018.CreditCreditAlessandra Sanguinetti/Magnum Photos

GEORGE R. R. MARTIN is in his element. Pen in hand, wearing his signature wool flat cap, he’s seated in a corner of the cavernous San Jose McEnery Convention Center, site of this year’s Worldcon — the World Science Fiction Convention, held annually since 1946. A long line snaking around stanchions inches forward. A hundred people, maybe more. A member of the convention staff stands near the table, explaining ground rules: one book at a time. If you want multiple books signed, you must go to the back of the line.

Martin, 70, banters with the young woman standing across from him as she proffers a hardcover bearing his name, her demeanor part reverent, part sheepish, the latter perhaps owing to the fact that this is her fifth or sixth time through the line. I’m trying to maintain a loose orbit around the author, the optimal distance to watch him without being creepy. His publicist takes me toward the queue. We wait until the book-bearing customers have exhausted their requests, and then all of a sudden I’m standing in front of the man. “Don’t be a fanboy,” I tell myself, trying to keep my cool as I explain that I’m observing him for this magazine story.

See all six of the 2018 Greats issue cover stories here.

“They took my picture in front of a rock,” he says, and then shows me a photo on his phone of him, indeed, standing before a large rock. He laughs, as he does often, and I see his eyes shift toward a person now in line behind me. Before I know it, Martin has politely and effortlessly moved on to her. “Hello. Back again?” he says, teasing her with a smile while at the same time putting her at ease.

“I do think a society needs heroes,” Martin says. “They don’t have to be flawless.”CreditAlessandra Sanguinetti/Magnum Photos

SOMETIME THIS SUMMER, sales of the first five books in Martin’s eventual heptalogy, “A Song of Ice and Fire,” surpassed 85 million copies sold worldwide. Now available in 47 languages, the series is also the basis for HBO’s “Game of Thrones,” by many measures the most popular television show on earth, airing in 170 countries.


A significant portion of Martin’s massive readership was already onto him well before April 2011, when the program first aired. Although the first book in the series, “A Game of Thrones,” was published in 1996 to modest expectations, as the enthusiasm of early readers and booksellers spread (the old-fashioned way, by word of mouth), there was a sense that Martin’s story was special — more than special, even: perhaps unlike anything fantasy readers had ever seen — and when the fourth book in the series, “A Feast for Crows,” was published in 2005, it debuted at the top of best-seller lists. After the HBO show premiered, the world Martin had created became a global phenomenon, and his readership reached heights few authors have ever found — his American peers now include other household names of genre fiction, such as Tom Clancy and Stephen King.

The plot of “ASOIAF,” as fans call it, is concerned largely with events unfolding in and around the continent of Westeros around the year 300 A.C. (“after conquest” of the seven kingdoms in the books). The inciting incident of the series is the death, under suspicious circumstances, of Jon Arryn, who had been serving as hand of the king (chief of staff, basically) to a royal named Robert Baratheon. Arryn’s demise sets in motion a chain of events leading to the murder of King Robert himself, which in turn creates a power vacuum, destabilizing the prevailing political order. After centuries of relative calm, chaos erupts into a full-blown war, involving several of the realm’s great family houses.


This war and its aftermath represent the titular game of thrones, which is played as much through court intrigue and council meetings as it is on the battlefield; where the most powerful moves involve not only the unleashing of dragons but strategic marriage proposals; where the key players include assassins, sorceresses and zombies — a game in which the most important pieces are people. “ASOIAF” is a fantasy series, but to call it that is an oversimplification, because it is also a story about power, family, ambition and history, on both a micro and macro scale, a myth that, however fantastical it can get, always resonates in our temporal world.



Throughout the books, Martin depicts a society simple enough to understand but complex enough in its dynamics to be a model and mirror of our own. His output, in fact, seems calibrated to optimize depth and breadth. “We know not only what characters think and feel, but what they eat, wear, see and smell — even the sex of their horses,” says Anne Groell, who has been Martin’s editor at Bantam Books for two decades. “George’s characters feel like people because they are people, with all the foibles and doubts and internal contradictions that every one of us contain. We can relate to these characters because we arethese characters.”

Those granular details, however, never come at the expense of narrative propulsion. For in Martin’s vast creation, sprawling in both space and time, there is an ever-present drive, an orienting polestar: Who will emerge victorious and sit on the namesake Iron Throne? Having this kind of compass gives both writer and reader latitude to enjoy Martin’s numerous digressions and discursive wanderings with the security of knowing that everything is somehow connected to that question. The stakes matter, and they are clear.


Kit Harrington as Jon Snow in “Game of Thrones.” CreditHelen Sloan/Courtesy of HBO

AS IMPRESSIVE AS Martin’s universe is, his fans’ engagement with it is perhaps even more so. In the science fiction and fantasy (SFF) community, people often refer to fanac (short for fan activity), which takes many forms: cosplay (costume play), fan art, fan fiction, even filk — a musical genre comprising original songs, parodies and covers — all shared and celebrated at local meet-ups or regional and national conventions. Technology has increased the number of venues, including podcasts, wikis, websites and message boards, for nerding out over a particular topic or piece of arcana, which previously may have occurred only in the back of a bookstore or game shop and now takes place largely online. In Martin’s case, this fanac seems to be in a permanent state of frenzy: The fan-maintained has become the foremost clearinghouse of information about his world; the process of readers attempting to predict the release of the next book in the series has its own name — Martinology, practitioners of which include the political analysis site FiveThirtyEight — and Martin himself journals regularly on his so-called Not a Blog at his eponymous website, where he ends each post with a description of his mood: melancholy, say, or bouncy. All told, it’s possible that more has been written about the fictional kingdoms of Westeros than about some actual countries on earth.

This conversation sometimes takes place in real time but also continues for years and decades — in the long wait between books (seven years after the last book, “A Dance With Dragons,” was published, the series’s sixth book, “The Winds of Winter,” still doesn’t have a publication date), or between seasons of the show — during which time the intensity of this unceasing, exhaustive speculation only ripens and intensifies. For years, fans obsessed over such mysteries as the possible lineage of the bastard Jon Snow, one of the main characters, forensically marshaling textual evidence in support of the theory (recently confirmed, at long last) that Snow was not a bastard and, in fact, might be the rightful heir to the Iron Throne.

The cumulative effect of all this activity has created a meta-layer, or perhaps a para-layer, a kind of atmosphere that exists above, next to, under and all around the fictional world created by Martin. This para-layer doesn’t actually change or otherwise affect the canon: It is crucial to the integrity of both the fans and the author himself that the boundary between the two is impermeable — there is no feedback loop, and even some of the readers refer to their contributions as “fan labor.” Theories are just that: theories, until they’re proved correct. Martin is the creator, we are the fans, and we rely on him for underlying text that is coherent and internally consistent, unchanging and unchangeable. And this is the way we want it. For one thing, it’s more fun to argue about theories when you believe that there is objective truth. I’ve read the books, and books about the books, and watched the show, and read recaps of the show, and listened to podcasts about the show and gone deep, deep down Reddit holes, discussion threads that start at the level of trivia and descend into minutiae. None of this would be possible with a lesser series, one without the complexity and consistency to support all of this geekery. In fact, this para-layer is essential to both contemporary fandom and “ASOIAF” in particular: The two domains, canon and fanac, validate each other, strengthening the power of each and improving the structure as a whole.

Sometimes this validation happens in tangible ways: Martin is adept at rewarding true fans. When he is visiting a city for a convention, he makes it a habit to go for a drink or a meal with the local chapter of the Brotherhood Without Banners (a multinational fan collective named after a group of characters from the books). At August’s Worldcon, he threw the after-party he has hosted on and off for more than four decades, where he gleefully danced to Daft Punk, mingling with fans, artists, editors and fellow writers.


Then there is Elio M. García Jr. and Linda Antonsson, a married superfan couple based in Sweden who, in 2007, started an unofficial fan-generated website (now called A Wiki of Ice and Fire) that has become the authoritative resource on the books — charting everything from the history of religious faith in Westeros to the flora and fauna of other continents in the books — that Martin himself now consults to fact-check details in his own writing process. (“I know for a fact that some errors have escaped into the printed book,” Groell says, “because dedicated fans have pointed them out.”) Together as a group, these readers — not just of the books but of the ephemera surrounding them, which now comprise official family histories of the characters and graphic novels, likewise released by Martin’s publisher — possess more information about “ASOIAF” than any one individual, creating a kind of permanent book club supporting the author. The result, conceived of by Martin but transcending his text, bridges the time between novels and the space between people: It is a hybrid literary beast (a fictional environment, a shared universe that overlaps with our own) sustained by a modern kind of authorship and the sheer force of its fans’ will.

MARTIN WAS RAISED in Bayonne, N.J., the son of a longshoreman and a factory worker. He has talked in the past about his childhood growing up in a federal housing project, gazing across the water at Staten Island, watching ships coming into port, imagining them traveling from distant lands he would never see.

He’s now based in Santa Fe, where he moved in 1979 from Dubuque, Iowa, where he was teaching journalism at Clarke College. After Tom Reamy, a friend of his and a fellow SFF author, died suddenly in 1977, at the age of 42, Martin was galvanized: “I thought, ‘Do I have all the time in the world? I want to write all these stories.’” He decided to quit teaching to write full time in New Mexico, spending the next decade and a half as a well-received, if not yet famous, fantasy author. He lives with Parris McBride, his second wife; the two of them are ardent supporters of the Wild Spirit Wolf Sanctuary, a nonprofit organization that rescues and provides sanctuary to captive-bred wolves. When it’s time for him to focus on his books, Martin heads to what he calls his “hideaway” in an undisclosed location.

In the 40 years since he began writing, a cultural tide has risen with him: The whole entertainment landscape seemingly picked up, moved over and sat down in a new realm, one where science fiction, fantasy and superheroes are at the epicenter of popular storytelling. Marvel and DC Comics and Steven Spielberg and George Lucas have had much to do with that, of course. But so has “ASOIAF,” bringing millions of people who previously wouldn’t have considered themselves genre fans or SFF readers (many of whom still might not, a form of cognitive dissonance that is its own topic, one for another day) to the fantasy aisles. The fact that Martin, a lone author, can be counted among the significant factors in this aesthetic sea change says as much about his influence as do the record-breaking television ratings or book sales.

Regarding those sales: Among epic fantasy series, “ASOIAF” is second only to J.R.R. Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings” (to which Martin’s work is often compared). Within this category, a distinction is sometimes drawn between “high” or “epic” fantasy, like Tolkien’s, and “low” fantasy, such as J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series. Putting aside the existence of a school for wizards (and magic in general), Harry and his friends inhabit a land that is recognizably similar to ours, whereas the best high-fantasy authors — Terry Pratchett, Terry Brooks, Ursula K. Le Guin — invent entirely new environments. “Lord of the Rings” has sold more than 150 million copies since it was first published as a trilogy beginning in 1954, placing it among the best-selling literature in any genre of all time. Although widely beloved — a 2003 poll in the United Kingdom found it to be Britain’s favorite novel, besting Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice” — and praised for the genius of its storytelling, Tolkien’s writing on the corrupting influences of power has been criticized in recent years for lacking psychological depth and leaning on reactionary politics.

The same cannot be said for “ASOIAF.” Though the series is considered relatively high fantasy, one of Martin’s significant achievements was combining the two realms, creating a new genre that relies on the wide-open flexibility of a high-fantasy world but written about from a low-fantasy lens, with a realism that grounds the story in human emotion and psychology. Each of Martin’s chapters is told through a different character’s perspective, allowing the reader to follow the story not from an omniscient fairy-tale narrator but in a voice that feels true to the time. The locales of Westeros aren’t airy glades, fields or castles in the sky; they are brothels and ale houses full of dark and grimy corners. Even when there are castles, they are not abstractions — they are characters’ living rooms.



Lena Heady as Cersei Lannister in “Game of Thrones.”CreditHelen Sloan/Courtesy of HBO

This grounded quality is enhanced by Martin’s gift for succinctly evoking more than what’s merely on the page. He knows how to reveal the tip of the iceberg and let the reader’s imagination supply the rest, lending a pleasing verticality to his society: dozens of noble houses, lesser houses beneath those, then landed knights and even extinct houses, all of which are cataloged in exhaustive taxonomic detail on A Wiki of Ice and Fire. Not only has he convincingly laid out the map of Westeros over 3,968 pages (so far), he’s also framed it, drawing a penetrable border around his world. At the edges of the story, both in a geographic and diegetic sense, we get hints of what lies beyond: The Others, for instance, terrifying undead beings who reside north of the Wall (a 700-foot-tall barrier made several thousand years ago out of magic and ice). These fringe elements provide perspective, a reminder that beyond our plot-driven sphere of concern lies a larger reality, one unconcerned with the Iron Throne.

It’s this kind of suggestively symbolic framework that mirrors Tolkien’s oeuvre. “I’m a huge fan of Tolkien,” Martin says, sitting upstairs in the Jean Cocteau Cinema, a movie theater in Santa Fe that originally opened in 1976, which the author bought in 2013 and renovated for the benefit of the community. “Sometimes it feels like I’m criticizing Tolkien when I talk about this stuff, but my admiration for him is huge. Nonetheless, sometimes I feel I’m in dialogue with Tolkien.”

“Tolkien wanted to do a mythology for England,” Martin continues. “I wanted to make my world more complete and more realistic. Tolkien says, after the end of ‘Lord of the Rings,’ ‘Aragorn [one of the primary protagonists] is the king and he ruled wisely and well for a hundred years,’ or whatever, but what does that actually mean? Many good men through history have been terrible kings. Many bad men have been good kings. Of course, now we live in a time where we have a bad man who is also a bad president.”

Martin, like Tolkien, has been adamant that he is not writing allegory, although he does admit that, living in the time in which he lives, influence is unavoidable. Still, he notes, his books are more inspired by historical events, such as the Hundred Years’ War in 14th-century France and Great Britain and the War of the Roses that followed soon after. And while “ASOIAF” may not be intended as a cautionary tale, it undoubtedly resonates with our contemporary environment: Through the machinations of the various Westerosi houses, Martin can write about politics without writing about politics; unlike the mostly clear lines of good and evil drawn in Tolkien’s Middle-earth, the morality of Martin’s realm is not one of unambiguous heroes and villains. His characters, from royals to peasants, tend to be ethically mutable. So-called good people, like the noblemen Ned Stark, his son Robb Stark or the indomitable Daenerys Targaryen (“the Mother of Dragons”), make terrible mistakes — out of weakness, pride or an overly rigid sense of right and wrong. And horrible people, like Jaime Lannister, known as “the Kingslayer,” do terrible things and then, over the course of several books, reveal themselves to be capable of heroism and sacrifice.

As we’re discussing this in the theater, Martin quotes Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” from memory: “The evil that men do lives after them;/ The good is oft interred with their bones.” Then he adds his own version: “We shouldn’t forget about the evil that good men do. But we shouldn’t forget about the good either,” he says. “I do think a society needs heroes. They don’t have to be flawless.”


Emilia Clarke as Daenerys Targaryen (“Mother of Dragons”) in “Game of Thrones.”CreditCourtesy of HBO


MARTIN STILL HAS two books left to finish; his delay is, unfortunately for him, one of his fans’ favorite topics. But when the final six episodes of “Game of Thrones” air in the spring of 2019, they will conclude the most successful series in HBO’s history. Shows of its scope, cost and ambition are, if not quite commonplace, not unusual anymore: “Game of Thrones” inaugurated an era of television with budgets in excess of $100 million for a season (as the seventh one, which aired in 2017, is said to have cost) and huge ensemble casts split into three or four units sometimes shooting simultaneously in different locations, such as remote Croatia and rural Iceland. “Thrones” set the bar high, creatively and financially, garnering a record 131 Emmy nominations to date and changing visual storytelling forever.

But Martin began writing “ASOIAF” because he was tired of hearing that the ideas he was pitching as a young television writer — stories that would require huge casts or expensive, realistic battles — wouldn’t be feasible on television (at least as it existed in the ’80s). Fiction offered him the chance to tell a different, more interior kind of story. And then, in an ironic twist, that very story ushered in a new era of TV, full of tangled points of view: five, six, seven or more story lines in a single episode; threads woven together within episodes, then within a season, then over seven seasons — the resulting fabric a dense weave that encourages and rewards obsession, the sort that requires looking up from your phone and viewing carefully, the Monday mornings after each episode devoted to argument and analysis. “George’s writing, and the world of Westeros he created, has universal appeal and something for every type of fan,” says Casey Bloys, HBO’s president of programming. “The series has created a community in the same way that the books did.”

The production has been called novelistic by critics, and rightly so. But as enjoyable as the HBO series is, there is a level of detail the books possess that can never be translated to television, no matter how much time or money is allocated. This richness comes from the care that Martin takes in cultivating his narrative and his community, both real and imagined. Ultimately, it’s this commitment that defines and explains the lasting power and popularity of “ASOIAF.” Westeros is undeniably bleak — you’d never want to actually spend time there — and even if you were lucky enough to be a highborn lord, it seems like a brutally hard, often miserable and perpetually dangerous place to live. But a writer’s true genius rests in allowing readers to perch tenuously at the precipice between his universe and ours, safely and curiously peeking over that gulf.

One of the complex pleasures of immersing yourself in Westeros is that — because it is fictional, and thus has fictional problems that seem bad but not quite as intractable as reality — you can glean something akin to world order (or the possibility of one) from this imaginary place. Despite the hopelessness of today, in this narrative, there is a clear vector of destiny, the possibility that someone, be it Jon Snow or Daenerys Targaryen or someone else altogether, will turn out to be the savior. That is why we keep reading and watching and asking Martin to give us more: for the promise of an ending that means something.

Local producer: Cyndy McCrossen. Photographer’s assistant: Kyra Kennedy

George R. R. Martin Answers Times Staffers’ Burning Questions

The writer discloses where he gets his signature hats and the “Game of Thrones” character that reminds him the most of Trump.


3:45George R. R. Martin on Trump, Climate Change and More
The writer of “A Game of Thrones” fields questions from New York Times staffer superfans. Published OnCreditCreditImage by Alessandra Sanguinetti/Magnum Photos

Produced by Jamie Sims

“If you could ask George R. R. Martin anything, what would it be?” This was the question that T posed to New York Times employees ahead of our Oct. 21 Greats issue, which features the author on one of its six different covers. The overwhelming number of responses revealed just how many “Game of Thrones” superfans are lurking in the newspaper’s bureaus, from New York to Washington, D.C., to Mexico City. We selected a handful of staffers’ queries for Martin to field on the set of his cover photo shoot, in Santa Fe, N.M., and filmed a number of his responses for the video above. Below are all of the questions that Martin answered — or, in some cases, tellingly declined to answer. Here’s what he had to say about his favorite books, where he gets his signature hats and the “Game of Thrones” character that reminds him the most of Trump.

Jack Gleeson as Joffrey Baratheon in “A Game of Thrones.” CreditHelen Sloan/HBO

Dowd: Who reminds you most of Trump? Dan Weiss [one of the “Game of Thrones” creators and writers] told me that the character that reminded him the most of Trump is Hodor because he endlessly repeats his own name.


Martin: Well, that’s amusing. But I think even during the campaign I said that Trump reminded me most of Joffrey. They have the same level of emotional maturity. And Joffrey likes to remind everyone that he’s king. And he thinks that gives him the ability to do anything. And we’re not an absolute monarchy, like Westeros is. We’re a constitutional republic. And yet, Trump doesn’t seem to know what that means. He thinks the presidency gives him the power to do anything. And so, yeah, Joffrey is Trump.

Dowd: I wonder how “Game of Thrones” provides insights into the mind-sets and strategies of modern-day geopolitics?

Martin: I’ll pass on that one.


From left: Sophie Turner as Sansa Stark and Carice van Houten as Melisandre, or “The Red Woman,” in “Game of Thrones.” CreditHelen Sloan/HBO

Dowd: What’s with you and redheads?

Martin: I like redheads! I’m married to a redhead. And I’ve known other redheads in the past. But I also like blondes and brunettes and other people, even women who occasionally shave their heads. So there’s — I think redheads are amazing.

Manjoo: Many observers have pointed out that “Game of Thrones” offers a perfect metaphor for understanding climate change. What do you think of this interpretation?


Martin: It’s kind of ironic because I started writing “Game of Thrones” all the way back in 1991, long before anybody was talking about climate change. But there is — in a very broad sense — there’s a certain parallel there. And the people in Westeros are fighting their individual battles over power and status and wealth. And those are so distracting them that they’re ignoring the threat of “winter is coming,” which has the potential to destroy all of them and to destroy their world. And there is a great parallel there to, I think, what I see this planet doing here, where we’re fighting our own battles. We’re fighting over issues, important issues, mind you — foreign policy, domestic policy, civil rights, social responsibility, social justice. All of these things are important. But while we’re tearing ourselves apart over this and expending so much energy, there exists this threat of climate change, which, to my mind, is conclusively proved by most of the data and 99.9 percent of the scientific community. And it really has the potential to destroy our world. And we’re ignoring that while we worry about the next election and issues that people are concerned about, like jobs. Jobs are a very important issue, of course. All of these things are important issues. But none of them are important if, like, we’re dead and our cities are under the ocean. So really, climate change should be the number one priority for any politician who is capable of looking past the next election. But unfortunately, there are only a handful of those. We spend 10 times as much energy and thought and debate in the media discussing whether or not N.F.L. players should stand for the national anthem than this threat that’s going to destroy our world.


Liam Cunningham as Davos Seaworth in “Game of Thrones.”CreditHBO

Galinsky: If you could pick the best real-world, present-day match — politicians, celebrities — for all the major characters in the show, who would you pick?

Martin: Pass.

Galinsky: What could our present day political leaders learn from Westeros?

Martin: I think there are a lot of — a lot of things going on in the world of Seven Kingdoms and Westeros that could be lessons to any ruler, past or present. Certainly at one point, the very simple statement is made that the king is about justice, or what is a king for? We don’t have kings. We have presidents and congressmen and all that. But it’s still what it’s about. It’s about serving the people and leaving the country in better shape when you leave office than it was when you took office. That should be the overriding principle of anyone who decides to run for office or do any sort of public service. Are you making things better? You’re there to serve the people, not to serve yourself, not to serve your contributors.

Hulse: When you started creating this weird and bloody and twisted world, did you ever conceive that it would become so popular?

Martin: No. Of course, I hoped it would be popular. I mean, you write a book or a series of books, and you hope that people will read them and enjoy them and that enough people will buy them so that you can continue to pay your mortgage and write other books. So you’re always hoping for a level of popularity. And I’ve been very fortunate in that regard. My career’s had ups and downs since I sold my first story in 1971. But there have been more ups than downs, and I’ve won awards, and I’ve had books that sold well. But nothing compared to how these books have sold. And it was already pretty heady and probably beyond any of my anticipations even before the TV show. And then when the TV show came, in the language of “Spinal Tap,” it got turned up to 11. And it’s been a pretty wild ride since. No, I did not anticipate it. No one can anticipate it. Even a successful TV show will get you a lot of popularity, of course. But “Game of Thrones” hasn’t just been asuccessful TV show. It’s been the most successful TV show in the world. And there’s no way anyone could possibly anticipate it, and certainly I did not, no. But it’s been fun.


Davenport: What are your own favorite books and TV shows?

Martin: Oh, God, there are so many, past, present and future. Favorite books — of course, “Lord of the Rings,” the science fiction fantasy of Jack Vance, one of my favorite authors, Robert A. Heinlein, whose works I grew up on, cut my teeth on, many other great science fiction and fantasy writers. Roger Zelazny, who was a mentor of mine who lived in Santa Fe, his masterpiece “Lord of Light,” many of his other great books, the Amber series, “Creatures of Light and Darkness” — marvelous, marvelous books. But I read a lot of other things, too, beyond science fiction. I mean, I love the work of Bernard Cornwell, who is doing historical fiction. Of course, I love “The Great Gatsby.” I love many mystery novels and thrillers. I’m presently reading and enjoying a lot of the Jack Reacher books of Lee Child, which I just encountered recently. I’ve been a big Stephen King fan for, you know, half a century, one of the great writers of our times. So you know — so many books, so little time. As for television, I was the first television generation. So I grew up on television, and I still watch it. We’re living in the golden age of television. There’s an amazing amount of terrific shows that are on right now, some which “Game of Thrones” is competing for in the Emmys, shows like “Better Call Saul,” and before it, “Breaking Bad,” filmed here in Albuquerque. HBO does incredible shows — “The Sopranos,” “Rome,” “The Deuce.” I love all of those, love some comedies. “Big Bang Theory,” I think is my favorite current comedy. There’s really more good TV shows than you can watch. And half the time I’m discovering them, they’ve already been canceled because we’re going through them so quickly. But for anyone who loves television, this is a great age.


Davenport: Do you consider yourself a history buff?

Martin: I do consider myself a history buff, particularly ancient and medieval history.

Davenport: Did any specific historical figures and events inspire the characters and story of “Game of Thrones?”

Martin: Yes, the English Wars of the Roses, the wars between the Yorks and the Lancasters. But even beyond the Wars of the Roses, which is a pretty obvious inspiration, I’ve read a lot about the Hundred Years’ War, the Crusades, the Albigensian Crusade. Medieval history is just a fascinating period, especially — I mean, I know most about English and French medieval history. I am interested in learning more about Spanish medieval history, German medieval history, Scandinavian medieval history, Russian, all of that. But unfortunately, there’s not as many sources in English as there are for the English and French medieval history. I also love ancient history — the Greeks, the Romans, Alexander the Great and his successors — fascinating stuff all.

Wilkinson: Where do you get your hats?

Martin: Many places. Many places. Mostly I’m known for wearing these kind of Greek sailor caps. But I actually have a lot of hats. Some, like the Stetsons and the fedoras and the cowboy hats, don’t travel so well with the big brims. So I only wear those around town.

Wilkinson: Do you do anything to groom your beard?

Martin: I have it trimmed and shaped every few weeks. It grows faster than the hair on my head. So I could look like an Old Testament prophet, if I didn’t watch it pretty carefully.


Franco: What other works of yours would you like to see adapted?

Martin: Well, we’re presently working on some “Wild Cards” television shows based on the “Wild Cards” series that I’ve been editing for the last 30 years. And that, I hope, will be coming to television in the next year or two. I have like a hundred short stories and five or six other novels out there. Some of them would make good television or film. Some would not. I think the one I’d most like to see would be my historical horror novel, “Fevre Dream,” that came out, a vampire novel set on the Mississippi River in the antebellum period. That was probably my best known book before “Game of Thrones.” And I think it’s one of my best. I’d love to see that one made.

Wells: The Sad Puppies campaign failed to materialize for the 2017 Hugo Awards, and the Rabid Puppies campaign didn’t find very solid footing. Are the Hugo Awards unbroken now, or are sci-fi and fantasy in ideological trouble?

Martin: Well, I think science fiction and fantasy are having ideological difficulties. But they’re not unique in that. It’s just that they’re not an exception. It’s the entire society that is having these troubles. We are such a deeply divided culture these days, such a deeply divided country. It’s not just S.F. and fantasy. You’re seeing it in gaming with Gamergate. You’re seeing it in comic books with what they’re calling Comicgate. You’re seeing it in young adult fiction with ridiculous internet purge campaigns. It’s coming from the extreme right. And it’s coming from the extreme left as well. And it is very dispiriting. But yes, it has invaded science fiction and fantasy in a big way. Fortunately, the traditional science fiction fans were able to push back against the various Puppy campaigns and win that fight, I think. But it took a toll — the Hugos are wounded. And more, the collegial atmosphere that united science fiction for most of my lifetime is changed. I mean, I remember days when you would have an extremely progressive left-wing author like Norman Spinrad or Harlan Ellison doing a panel with a conservative author like Jerry Pournelle. And they would go hammer and tongs at each other on a panel, arguing the ideas. And then they would adjourn to the bar and drink together and sing old songs for a few hours. That doesn’t seem to exist anymore, the idea of science fiction or fantasy as something that could unite people from all over the political spectrum. It’s a different age. I’m sometimes reminded of Yeats’s “Second Coming”: “Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; / … / The best lack all conviction, and the worst are full of passion and intensity.”

Sidell: If you could go back and not kill off one character, who would it be and why?

Martin: Pass.


A map of the city of Braavos by the fantasy cartographer Jonathan Roberts, from George R. R. Martin’s “The Lands of Ice and Fire.”

Lanis: Where would you live in Westeros or Essos?

Martin: Oh, I would probably — the free city of Braavos in Essos would be a cool place to live.

Lanis: What plot choice do you most regret?

Martin: Eh, pass.

Gendler: In “A Song of Ice and Fire,” we’re introduced to many god systems in which the dichotomy is aligned with the fight between the others and the living. However, we seem to —

Martin: I’ll pass.

Holmes: Will the audience learn more about Joanna Lannister’s back story, specifically her relationship with Tywin and her children?


Martin: Have to keep reading the books to find out.

Holmes: Did she live long enough to meet Tyrion, and did she love him, or was she repulsed?

Martin: Read the books.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.